The law of unintended consequences is immutable.

   Jun 26, 2020


Protesting the Murder of George Floyd, Washington, DC. June 6, 2020. (photo: Ted Eytan)

How ever well-meaning their reasons, media personalities, politicians, and medical experts have ignored the dangers of not social distancing during the large George Floyd protests.

In so downplaying that risk, they have not kept the public properly informed, protected or on its guard. By encouraging people to protest in large numbers, these powerful influencers have inadvertently convinced too many people that the threat of Covid-19 isn’t all that dire.

We are now seeing the resulting spike in Covid-19 cases that this laxity has caused.

Image for post
Protesters sit at the intersection of James Street and 4th Avenue in Downtown Seattle. June 4, 2020. (photo: SounderBruce)
Of course "1,300 health professionals" sounds impressive; until you are reminded that there are over 18 million health professionals working in the United States today.

Early in the protests, major media outlets made much of an open lettersigned by almost 1,300 health professionals, infectious diseases professionals and community stakeholders advocating for the massive protests and the millions of people who have attended such events over the last few weeks.

With an authority that belies their statistically tiny number, the letter states, “In addressing demonstrations against white supremacy, our first statement must be one of unwavering support for those who would dismantle, uproot, or reform racist institutions.”

Former CDC Director Tom Frieden wrote on Twitter on Jun. 2 that “the threat to Covid control from protesting outside is tiny compared to the threat to Covid control created when governments act in ways that lose community trust. People can protest peacefully AND work together to stop Covid. Violence harms public health.”

By amplifying opinions like these, and ignoring the opinions of other public health and infectious disease experts who did not agree that protesting during a pandemic was a good idea, however righteous and just the cause, media companies gave the impression that protesting was sanctioned by a consensus of public health authorities.

Conservative commentatorsliberal academics and health professionals alike have accused experts and politicians of mixed and controversial messaging about mass gatherings in public.

On Jun. 4, CDC Director Robert Redfield urged a more cautious tone, warning the public that the protests could cause a drastic upsurge in coronavirus cases, just like the one we are seeing now.

Image for post
George Floyd, Black Lives Matter protest in Philadelphia, PA. May 30, 2020. (photo: Joe Piette)

On Jun. 11, Tom Frieden- perhaps having a change of heart about the protests given the pandemic- retweeted an article posted by CNN with the caption “Plain and simple: the US has not controlled this virus and it’s still spreading. We must be prepared for a resurgence, including urgently scaling up our efforts to test, isolate, contact trace, and quarantine.”

Public officials and health experts are fielding criticism for supporting the anti-police brutality protests in May after condemning the anti-lockdown protests so strenuously protests in April. Critics argue this changing strategy reflects ideology rather than science, and contributed to a loss of credibility for public health officials.

CNN, on Apr. 20 tweeted “A group of ICU nurses showed up to counter-protest an anti-stay-at-home demonstration in Pennsylvania on Monday.”

Concerning protests for George Floyd, CNN headlined a story that read “Over 1,000 health professionals sign a letter saying, Don’t shut down protests using coronavirus concerns as an excuse.”

Ten days later, CNN warned readers that Trump’s Tulsa campaign rally alone could cause a spike in coronavirus infection. The headline of the June 15th article read “Tulsa health director wishes Trump would postpone rally because of spike in Covid 19 cases.”

On June 14, at 4:50 pm, NBC News tweeted the link to an article they wrote titled “Rally for Black trans lives draws packed crowd to Brooklyn Museum Plaza.

Not a full two hours later, at 6:15 pm, NBC News tweeted the link to another article titled “President Trump plans to rally his supporters next Saturday for the first time since most of the country was shuttered by the coronavirus. But health experts are questioning that decision.”

On Jun 16 ABC News tweeted the link to an article captioned “As Pres. Trump pushes ahead with an upcoming rally in Oklahoma, multiple health experts told @ABC News they fear the event could supercharge the spread of the coronavirus in an area that’s already seeing cases on the rise.”

ABC News has consistently posted updates, stories and tweets about the protests, even showing drone footage of a massive protest sans social distancing. On Jun. 9 ABC News tweeted “HOLLYWOOD PROTEST: Drone footage shows demonstrators filling Hollywood Boulevard in Black Lives Matter protest.”

Time Magazine went as far as to chastise far right protestors for gathering during the same time frame as the police brutality movement, while simultaneously praising black lives matter protests.

Jun. 10, Time published a story titled “Why so Many Doctors Support Protestings in a Pandemic.” Three days later, Time published an article titled “Hundreds of Far-right U.K. Protestors Defy COVID-19 Restrictions to Demonstrate in London

DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall understands why the protests have taken center stage, but noted that social distancing should not be abandoned.

“The timeliness and dramatic nature of the protests around the country demand extensive coverage, but news editors should not forget the other big story that the nation has been confronting for several months. The protests and the COVID-19 news topics are certainly merged to some extent, given that most big cities are still requiring social distancing and masks.” — Jeffery McCall, DePauw University.

Trump’s rally can’t be blamed; all told, a grand total of 6,000 people showed up in Tulsa, a turnout that was truly embarrassing for a number of reasons.

The “Open-Up” protestors can hardly be blamed; that was hardly a movement at all. It drew a few thousand people nationwide.

The George Floyd protests have brought millions out of their homes and into the streets. It is impossible to pretend that the protests had nothing to do with the current surge in Covid-19 cases. Not after the media did such an excellent job in the preceding months convincing everyone it was deadly to go outside.

The George Floyd protests are the very definition of a super-spreader event, as defined by the CDC.

What health experts and media personalities who encouraged the protests in spite of the clear risk to public health are missing is the message their support sent to everyone, whether they’re involved in the George Floyd protests or not.

The message read and received was: “It’s ok to go out in massive numbers if you have a good enough reason.”

And if it's ok to gather in massive numbers if you have a good enough reason, it must be ok to do other things, too.

Police brutality in the U.S. is a horrible problem. Institutional racism exists and it's deadly. The wealth-gap is real; as are the school-to-prison pipeline, prison labor, and for-profit prisons.

And human nature is human nature.

“If they can do it, why can’t I?” is a powerful human motivator, as any exasperated parent can tell you.

“Do as I say, not as I do,” is not a powerful motivator in the slightest.

(Contributing journalist, Allegra Nokaj) (Contributing writer, Brooke Bell)